next up previous contents
Next: The effect of transition Up: Thermodynamics of Small Lennard-Jones Previous: The Harmonic Superposition Method Home: Return to my homepage

Anharmonicity

 Most attempts to model anharmonicity have concentrated on small systems. As the size of the system increases the difficulty increases greatly. For example, it would be impossible to do the necessary multi-dimensional phase space integrals in the definition of $\Omega(E)$,
\begin{displaymath}
\Omega(E)={1\over h^\kappa}\int\int\delta(H-E) dq^\kappa dp^\kappa.\end{displaymath} (3.11)
Most approaches either attempt to calculate the anharmonic element using known information from the PES, such as the third and fourth derivatives of the potential at the minima and the dissociation energies[163] or assume the PES has a certain topology for which the partition function is known[164,165]. A normal mode approximation is often used because the multi-dimensional partition function is then the product of the one-dimensional normal mode partition functions. However, to then obtain the density of states the partition function must be inverse Laplace transformed. This procedure does not necessarily have an analytic solution, and so numerical methods sometimes have to be used[166,167].

The only attempt, that we know of, to evaluate analytically the anharmonic density of states of clusters is due to Chekmarev and Umirzakov[165]. Their expression contained a number of unknown parameters, which they had to estimate. This approximate approach was partly due to their lack of information about the PES of 13, the cluster they considered. They showed their form was able to produce the types of feature seen in the 13 caloric curve, if not to reproduce it accurately. The approach we use here is similar. We are looking for a relatively simple method that will provide an analytical expression for the anharmonic contribution to $\Omega(E)$. We also want to examine how far it is possible to use information extracted from the PES in this task. We will focus on 55 as a test of the methods developed. For 55 we have a sample of 3481 transition states which were found from a random selection of 402 of the minima in sample B defined above[90]. We have also calculated the analytical third derivatives for this potential.



 
next up previous contents
Next: The effect of transition Up: Thermodynamics of Small Lennard-Jones Previous: The Harmonic Superposition Method Home: Return to my homepage
Jon Doye
8/27/1997